‘Women paid to give up smoking when pregnant’ An eye catching and rant worthy headline indeed.
You will recall I was similarly ranty about ‘Women paid to breastfeed’
I imagine most people would instantly balk at the idea, paid to do something you should either do anyway or at least that you should just make a personal choice over? Why bribe someone into making a good choice? Why reward someone for doing the right thing? Don’t we as humans have intellect, a moral compass, and a brain capable of making rational and informed decisions?
It’s not the only time ‘incentives’ have been used either. People have been paid to lose weight too and I’m sure there are other examples. (Who else remembers this little gem of an idea from 2009)
Ranty me can’t help wondering if, as I am, you are lazy is it not reasonable for the NHS to chuck us £20 or so to go for a brisk walk! It might sway me.
Yes but it works you say? It saves money and lives you say? The ethics don’t matter if it works the politicians cry!
Don’t they? Really? They are arguing that the end justifies the means? Well then I suggest a cheaper but I’m sure equally effective idea. We bring back the stocks. People caught making the wrong life choices should be placed in the stocks on the village green with a sign round their neck and we can fling rotten fruit at them. I bet that would work too. Would it make it OK if it worked?
|Copyright: / 123RF Stock Photo|
Do the ends ever justify the means? What do you think? Is paying people to behave well a reasonable idea?